Total Pageviews

Popular Posts

Sunday, May 16, 2021

'PALESTINE' IS ON HISTORY'S WRONG SIDE

 

I was going to wait and see but such a grossly lying title of a post as ‘Be Human; Support Palestine tipped me over the edge!
I will start here with some fairly recent historical background.
1695: An Ottoman census shows Hebrew surnames still make up a majority of Jerusalem residents and a large chunk of what some still call ‘Judea’.
What happens next? Here it comes.
1834: A local uprising is put down in typical Ottoman fashion. I doubt whether you want the details of what that means. In any case, the land is so depopulated that the Ottomans offer free land to any Ottoman veteran who will come and settle in present-day Israel/Palestine, be they Turkish, Macedonian, Epirean, Egyptian or Bosnian.
1868: Mark Twain publishes Innocents Abroad and relates how sadly depopulated and dessicated the Holy Land was then. He has no reason to lie.
1882: Even before modern Zionism began, Jews start returning to the Land of Israel.
1894: Modern Zionism begins when Theodor Herzl, reporting from Paris for a Viennese newspaper, hears a mob yelling, “A mort les Juifs!” (Death to the Jews!) in the wake of the trumped-up conviction of Captain Alfred Dreyfus for treason and his mind starts to mull over the ramifications.
Between 1900 and 1920 was when Jews started returning to their ancient land in a more organized fashion. They bought all the land on which they settled. Usually they paid twice "first with money and then with sweat and blood." They decided they would work the land themselves rather than be overseers. Still, they brought new life to a moribund land and, as they did, Arabs started coming in from neighboring areas.
In 1920, in the wake of World War I and the final collapse of the Ottoman Empire, the British were ‘given the mandate’ over, by agreement among the powers and between Prince Faisal and Chaim Weizmann, the area which was to be the Jewish National Home. Originally, it included the area now known as the Kingdom of Jordan.
However, Jew-hating elements in the British High Command found a way to frustrate this: they supported a Jew-hater from the powerful Husseini clan for Mufti of Jerusalem. Haj Amin el-Husseini had fought in the Ottoman army and saw the return of the Jews as the biggest obstacle to his quest for despotic power.
He also knew what ‘buttons’ to push to rouse the Arab population — much the same buttons as Southern politicians used to push to rouse up the peckerwoodies to vote for them. They’re doing it now, too.
Google and read a section of ‘dhimmi’ laws under Muslim rule and tell me how different it is (or, more likely, similar) to Jim Crow laws ans customs not only in the South, but throughout most of the country. Then google and read what LBJ said to a young Bill Moyers and reflect on the universality of the wicked joy of having someone to look down on!
So, what have we here so far? first, a land so largely denuded that the Ottomans had to offer free land to refill it. Second, it wasn’t refilled to much of an extent. Third, exiles returning with new technologies. Fourth, a clan who saw them as a threat to their power and whose head knew how to get the locals foaming by telling lies about the returnees meaning to simply turn the tables as opposed to crafting a bigger table for everyone in the land.
From 1920 to 1948, 100,000 more Arabs than Jews entered the Palestine Mandate. This was because the British pretty much let Arabs come and go as they pleased as opposed to the tight regulations they put on Jewish immigration.
The 1930s is where the ‘turn’ starts. Before 1940, nearly every Jewish community had its anti-Zionists and in some communities they were quite numerous. After 1945, they were gone — many murdered and gone up the chimneys. But when the Jews of Germany at first and then of Austria, Czechoslovakia and Poland sought refuge, no nation would take them. Repeat: no nation wanted more Jews.
This is something that no large number of Jews will ever forget — or forgive. Not for at least a thousand years. I for one say Jews are right to trust no one else with their safety and protection. And I do say the same as regards the native peoples and nations of the Americas and Oceania — that is, Australia and New Zealand. I also say the same regarding our own fellow citizens of African heritage. And had Rommel won at El Alamein and gone on to Palestine, El-Husseini would have had the extermination camps in the Dothan valley which he wanted to build and operate. So those who follow him are not as guiltless as they whine and wail; nowhere near the case!
There are many things in Israel of which I don’t approve, most of which have to do with racism of lighter-skinned people against darker-skinned. But most Jews and Arabs are the same olive shading. Besides, are we saying Jews should be more than human? Especially when we set the bar as low as many of us do for their Arab cousins? Read what brother Eldridge (Cleaver) had to say about Jews and Arabs after living in Algeria for seven years!
Let’s jump ahead to 2006, to the last real deal that Abbas killed between Israel and Fatah. Israel offered him 95% of what he asked for. And when Abbas told the then-Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia (now the late king) about it, the prince threw up his hands and expostulated, “You actually turned this deal down?! That’s it! We can’t support you anymore; you’re on your own!!”
As Jewish life and culture points back to what some call Eretz Israel and that it’s a settled fact that Jewish genomes, including the Ashkenazic genome, are still at least 75% Levantine Semitic, I consider Jews as the oldest indigenous people to their land.
And arising from that, I have an invitation to make and a pair of questions to address to the howlers against these particular facts. The invitation arises from the first question, which is this: Do you think that indigeneity has an expiration date, or that it ‘wears off’ after a certain period of time? If you do, I invite you to take that interesting little notion either to any Native powwow or, say, a Maori luau and see what happens then!
Second question is this: If Israel is a ‘European colony’, then how is it that Jews returned thither from elsewhere in the Middle East consistently vote Likud or even further right instead of, say, for the Arab List? I’d really like to know.
Finally, I’d like to say that I applaud any and all sincere efforts to ‘weave’ peace between Jews and Arabs in the land ‘from the ground up’. I suspect the current government looks coldly on such attempts, in which I feel the government is making a serious mistake. Bibi’s been too close with Kachites and their like for way too long. All the more respect from me for those who seek to ‘weave’ real peace in the face of coldness and hostility from both the current Israeli government and the PA.
But too much of what I’ve lately read might as well have been ripped from the pages of the Protocols. So I must speak the truth now.

Wednesday, May 12, 2021

POLITICS FROM THE NECK DOWN

Some weeks ago, I observed how poor we liberals and progressives are at dealing with human irrationality. I further observed that fascists of any kind live and die by irrationality. They'll only deal with facts convenient to their bunk lines.
I now suggest that a, perhaps the, line of separation between the democratic left and what might be called the alt-left is in their respective attitudes toward human irrationality. The alt-left is rare now, much weaker than it was when I was in college, but it does still barely exist. We of the democratic left tend to treat irrational human nature as either one's own concern or, sometimes, as an inconvenience or weakness which needs transcending. The alt-left seems to me to have declared war on human irrationality, without realizing that 1) in believing that they've declared war on human irrationality, they are actually living by it and 2) the result of such 'wars' on human nature from the neck down tend to be very bloody indeed and 3) there is no going 'back to the Garden' and attempts to do so result only in bloodshed and more bloodshed. Neither alt-side grasps that last.
If we can gauge someone's politics by how they deal with human nature from the neck down, it is still also true that the political spectrum is a globe with a democratic Prime Meridian on one side of it with the democratic left and democratic right on either side. On the other side of the globe is the Autocracy Date Line with the alts back to back along it.
The alt-right is today's great danger to democracy as we all know. They're the ones who seek to grab their target followers by the heart and the gut and, if they could, have everyone headless at the same time. Now is the time that the democratic left and right need to join together and work out a way of grabbing the hearts and guts of those we need in order to preserve and extend democracy!
We of the democratic left have always been very good at engaging our actual and hopeful voters from the neck up; now we need to do the same below the neck. We cannot afford to ignore human irrationality in this time when it has an alarmingly good chance of swallowing us all up--human civilization, perhaps human existence and possibly many other animals and plants we cherish and/or know are instrumental to our own existence and flourishing.
First step is, we need to quit playing at being entirely rational beings ourselves. That's probably a big part of why people who, taking a largely above-the-neck view of their interests, ought to support us, don't. It's probably a large source of motivation for 'owning the libs'.
Tell more stories from our own growing up. I could tell plenty, for instance, about growing up in one of the few successfully racially (and economically) integrated neighborhoods in the whole country, never mind the city, and how it continues to shape my own personality and politics. Most of the MSNBC anchors seem to grasp this now. We need to share these histories with others and we probably need to keep hammering them until those who don't want to believe our truth have no choice but to know what we speak is the truth!
Above all, we need to engage our fellow-citizens by their hearts and guts as well as their heads. Maybe it's because the alt-left is at war with human irrationality that it's so much weaker than the alt-right. We may not like the conclusions to which this fact may lead us, but if we mean to be real liberals, progressives and small 'd' democrats, we need to face that fact and follow its ramifications. In any case, we need to engage and involve our fellow-citizens with both urgency and hope. The first because the jobs at hand needed doing yesterday, the second because without it, too many of us may succumb to despair's inertia. We can't afford that now either. Now we must rally and organize to save our country, our planet and to save and extend democracy.